Legal Opinion

Holbrook v. Industrial Tractor & Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 3, 1935No. [No. 63, January Term, 1935.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The question here is as to the right of a foreign receiver to sue in the courts of this state on a contract between the receiver and his customer.

The plaintiff, appellant, had been appointed receiver for the W. A. Riddell Company, an Ohio corporation, by a court of that state, and, as such receiver, from May 11th, 1933, to October 17th, 1933, sold several bills of merchandise, consisting of tractor machinery, appliances, and equipment, to the Industrial Tractor & Equipment Company, Inc., appellee. The total purchases from the receiver amounted to $737.29, credits $135.35, leaving a balance of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Relfe v. RundleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Day v. Postal Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taggart v. Wachter, Hoskins & Russel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. Progressive Grocers' Ass'n v. GoldenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Grant v. Allied Developers, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API