Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Circuit Attorney v. Finn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for quo warranto.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

•This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto, filed by the acting circuit attorney of the Eighth Judicial Circuit, to try the right of John Finn, the sheriff of the city of St. Louis, to execute process of the St. Louis Criminal Court. A similar information was at the same time filed to try the right of Finn, as sheriff, to execute process of the Probate Court of the city of St. Louis, and of the Court of Criminal Correction. In each case the answer filed was the same, mutatis mutandis, and the subsequent proceedings were the same. The two causes, were argued and submitted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. County Court v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. State ex rel. Berry v. ShieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. McKeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  5. In re JilzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rucker v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Walker v. BusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Donham v. YancySupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Brown v. MarshallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. Guinzburg v. ClaudeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API