Legal Opinion

United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Ass'n

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 11, 1967No. 64 Civ. 3914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, District Judge:

This is an action brought to enjoin the price-fixing and business allocation activities of five fertilizer producers in connection with sales of fertilizer, made under the United States Foreign Aid Program, which was destined for the Republic of Korea. The challenged activities were conducted through the defendant Concentrated Phosphate Export Association, Inc. (CPEA), organized by the other defendants, or their respective corporate predecessors, in 1961. All facts have been stipulated. The question of law presented is whether the exemption from the Sherman Act…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Palmer v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pacific Seafarers, Inc. v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API