Legal Opinion

Favour v. Frohmiller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1934No. Civil No. 3477PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This is an original application by A. H. Favour, a member of the Colorado River commission, for a writ of mandamus against Ana Frohmiller, state auditor, to compel her to audit and allow his itemized and verified claim for travel, hotel bill and incidental expenses for a trip to Washington, D. C., in. Octobér, 1933, in attendance upon the business of the commission, amounting to $442.35.

The respondent disallowed the “items covering hotel and meals,” because, as she says, they are “in excess of $5.00 per day as allowed by chapter 40, Laws 1933.” On behalf of respondent, the Attorney General…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Industrial Commission v. Arizona State Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State of Arizona v. MiserArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Arizona Corp. Commission v. Catalina Foothills EstatesArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hudson v. BrooksArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. United States v. William BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API