Legal Opinion

Martin v. McCarthy

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1893Published

Error to the District Court of Pueblo County.

1Opinion of the CourtRichmond, P. J.

November 26, 1890, Frank C. Taft made an assignment' for the benefit of his creditors to Edmund H. Martin, plaintiff in error. Prior to the assignment, the sheriff of Pueblo county, T. Gr. McCarthy, pursuant to a writ of attachment sued out, seized a stock of merchandise and had the same in custody at the time of the assignment. The assignee demanded possession of the stock, which was refused. Thereafter Beifeld & Co. instituted an attachment proceeding in the district court of Arapahoe county against Taft and the *38sheriff of Pueblo county and levied upon the property covered by the assignment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loeb v. . WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Merritt v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Crossman v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Freas v. EngelbrechtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  5. Parks v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API