Legal Opinion
Alford v. Cassel (In Re Cassel)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided March 14, 2005No. 19-80150PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS L. PERKINS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the adversary proceeding brought by the Plaintiffs, Thomas Alford (ALFORD) and Lamar Harris (HARRIS) (together referred to as the PLAINTIFFS), seeking a determination of nondischargeability under Section 523(a)(2) for a debt owed to each of them by the Debtor, A. DeWayne Cassel, II (DEBTOR). The PLAINTIFFS invested $60,000 in a business owned and operated by the DEBTOR and allege that they were deceived as to the financial condition of the company.
BACKGROUND
ACT Bending & Steel Co., Inc. (ACT) was a metal fabricator of tubular…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Harold W. McClellan v. Bobbie Darrell CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- In the Matter of Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor. Goldberg Securities, Inc. v. Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development v. Sanderson (In re Sanderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Stelmokas v. KodziusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Anthony Stelmokas v. Vytautas KodziusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Brady v. PliuraDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2020
- In re: Deandre Lamont White; Stephanie Rhodes v. Deandre Lamont WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.