Legal Opinion
223 Chelsea Associates, L. L. C. v. Dobler
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 15, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered May 12, 2000 affirmed, with $10 costs.
Since these holdover proceedings were erroneously brought upon the ground that the premises became exempt from regulation upon satisfaction of the Federal mortgage and termination *171of tenants’ HUD leases, Civil Court correctly dismissed the holdover petitions. The building was substantially rehabilitated in 1967 with the assistance of Federal funds conditioned upon the (former) owner’s participation in a low-income housing program. As authoritatively decided in parallel litigation involving the immediately adjoining…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- 640 Broadway Renaissance Co. v. RossiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- 221 West 16th Realty L. L. C. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4Cited by2 opinions
- 435 Central Park West Tenant Ass'n v. Park Front Apartments, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2017
- 435 Cent. Park W. Tenant Assn. v. Park Front Apts., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018