Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott Walker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
*246SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. and ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.
¶ 22. (dissenting). Essential to our system of justice is adherence to the rule of law. The per curiam today attempts to transform the rule of law into an untenable rule of defiance: government officials who are defendants in a case need not obey a court's declaratory judgment that precludes enforcement of a facially unconstitutional statute.
¶ 23. A novel case such as this one, involving issues of great national importance and core constitutional rights, deserves a well-reasoned and well-supported decision. Instead, the per curiam's…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.