Legal Opinion · Dissent

Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Scott Walker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2013No. 2012AP002067Published

1Dissent

*246SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. and ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.

¶ 22. (dissenting). Essential to our system of justice is adherence to the rule of law. The per curiam today attempts to transform the rule of law into an untenable rule of defiance: government officials who are defendants in a case need not obey a court's declaratory judgment that precludes enforcement of a facially unconstitutional statute.

¶ 23. A novel case such as this one, involving issues of great national importance and core constitutional rights, deserves a well-reasoned and well-supported decision. Instead, the per curiam's…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API