Legal Opinion

Dixie v. Mulroy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that this proceeding was not timely commenced. Petitioner was entitled to appear with counsel and be heard on his request for reinstatement of his pistol license (see, Matter of Gordon v LaCava, 203 AD2d 290; Matter of Demchik v Hannigan, 182 AD2d 1133; Matter of Burke v Colabella, 113 AD2d 794). The determination was not "final and binding” upon petitioner until respondent denied that request (CPLR 217 [1]).

Respondent’s denial of the request for reinstatement, based upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MATTER OF O'CONNOR v. ScarpinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Gordon v. LaCavaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Burke v. ColabellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Demchik v. HanniganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Eddy v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API