Legal Opinion

Kehrer v. Weismueller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1931No. 28,206PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action on promissory note against the makers. Defendants Weismueller are husband and wife. A verdict was directed against the husband for the full amount of the note, and he appeals, from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial. A verdict was directed in favor, of the wife, and she is not a party to the appeal.

Plaintiff sues as administrator of the estate of Andrew Weismueller. Defendants executed and delivered to him the $2,500 note in suit January 14,1916. It matured January 14, 1921. The payee died August 31, 1920. The note is outlawed under C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. ForsythIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Visher v. WilburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Kisler v. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  5. Croman v. StullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RTC Commercial Loan Trust v. TempletonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API