Kehrer v. Weismueller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action on promissory note against the makers. Defendants Weismueller are husband and wife. A verdict was directed against the husband for the full amount of the note, and he appeals, from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial. A verdict was directed in favor, of the wife, and she is not a party to the appeal.
Plaintiff sues as administrator of the estate of Andrew Weismueller. Defendants executed and delivered to him the $2,500 note in suit January 14,1916. It matured January 14, 1921. The payee died August 31, 1920. The note is outlawed under C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carroll v. ForsythIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Visher v. WilburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Kisler v. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Hill v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- Croman v. StullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
3Cited by1 opinion
- RTC Commercial Loan Trust v. TempletonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997