Legal Opinion
McClellan v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 12, 1995No. 2:94-cv-70799PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On March 2, 1994, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant Paul D. McClellan (“Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint for Tax Refund, seeking refund of $200, plus interest, costs and attorney fees for employment taxes 1 erroneously assessed and collected. The Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff United States of America (“Defendant”) filed an amended answer and counterclaim on June 27, 1994. In addition to denying liability for the requested refund, Defendant sought $85,617, plus statutory interest and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re Billie Vester Rasbury, Debtor. Billie Vester Rasbury Bill's Forestry Service, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Leopold Z. Sher and Karen B. Sher v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- John W. Bode and Toni Bode v. United States of America, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Options for Senior America Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Snyder v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- KM Systems, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005