Legal Opinion

State v. Burten

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 20, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

219 N.J. Super. 156 (1987)

530 A.2d 30

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MARVIN F. BURTEN, RICHARD A. BURTEN AND HOWARD L. KASKEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 12, 1987.

Decided January 20, 1987.

John A. Craner argued the cause for appellant (Craner, Nelson, Satkin & Glazner, attorneys).

Marvin M. Goldstein argued the cause for respondents Marvin F. Burten and Richard A. Burten (Grotta, Glassman & Hoffman, attorneys).

Lawrence P. Platkin argued the cause for respondent Howard L. Kaskel (Robinson, Wayne, Levin, Riccio & LaSala,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. TRUSTEES OF LOCAL 478 TRUCKING & ALLIED IND. PENSION FUND v. PirozziNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  2. State v. BurtenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. State v. BurtenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PulastyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. MorashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. State v. SirventNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API