Legal Opinion

Shackleford Coal Co. v. Hamby

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 3, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Bill Hamby sought workmen’s compensation benefits based on his claim of total disability as the result of silicosis. The Board dismissed his claim without determining whether he has demonstrated disability from silicosis, based on the Board’s conclusion that Hamby’s claim is barred by reason of KRS 342.316(4). On Hamby’s appeal to the circuit court, the Board’s award was set aside and the case remanded for further findings of fact by the Board. The present appeal challenges the circuit court’s judgment and seeks to have the Board’s findings reinstated.

Hamby worked in coal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beth-Elkhorn Corporation v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. W. M. Coal Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961
  3. Lovell v. Osborne Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
  4. Moore Mining Co. v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. South East Coal Co. v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
  2. South East Coal Co. v. IsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API