Legal Opinion

Raiford v. U.S. Industries/Ames Lawn & Garden Tools

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 2006No. 2005-CA-0815PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., Judge.

hThe plaintiff, Karen Raiford, is appealing a judgment by the trial court against her and in favor of the defendants, Ames Lawn & Garden Tools and its insurer, National Union Insurance Company. She is also appealing a judgment denying her motion for a new trial that would have allowed her the opportunity to conduct discovery regarding an item of evidence that was unknown to Ms. Raiford until it was introduced into evidence by Ames on the second day of the trial.

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Ms. Raiford was planting a rose garden along the side of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. LeBlanc v. StevensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. Zatarain v. WDSU-Television, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Patriot v. Mississippi Land HoldingsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Stead v. SwannerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Ramos v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Raiford v. US INDUSTRIES/AMES LAWNLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API