Legal Opinion

Turner v. City of Citronelle

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 24, 1989No. 87-837PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STEAGALL, Justice.

Defendants, Albert C. Turner, Edna E. Turner, and Albert Earl Turner, appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the City of Citronelle (“City”) establishing a boundary line between a parcel of land owned by the Turners and a contiguous parcel owned by the City and located in Mobile County.

The City owned land contiguous to land owned by the Turners. On the property owned by the City was constructed a park and a lake (hereinafter “Park”). The Park was located next to a parcel of land owned by the Turners and referred to as the “Northern 40.” While constructing the Park, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. PutmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Martin v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Bobo v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Cleland v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. M.C. Dixon Family Partnership, LLLP v. Envision Properties, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API