Legal Opinion

Cendagarda v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1933No. 722PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Henry Cendagarda, Frank Aboitiz, and Charles W. Brown were charged by indictment containing three counts with violations of section 88, title 18, USCA (section 37, Criminal Code). The court sustained a demurrer to the second count and directed a verdict of not guilty as to the first count.

Tho third count alleged that a complaint was filed before the United States commissioner for the Northern Division of the District of Utah charging Simon Bertolli with violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA), and that a warrant was issued thereon for tho arrest of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Hyde v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. United States v. KeitelSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Minner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GlasserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. KaiserDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API