Legal Opinion

Rishel v. Rishel

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1994No. 19-10059PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOSEPH L. COSETTI, Chief Judge.

The issue before the court is whether Sandra L. Rishel’s (“Debtor”) attorneys’ fees are considered to be “compensation of the trustee” within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 363(j), thus disallowing the payment of attorneys’ fees as a cost and expense of the sale of property. After careful consideration and for the reasons stated below, the court determines that when a debtor brings a sale of property as the co-owner of the property, the debtor is acting in the capacity of a trustee. Therefore, the debtor’s attorney cannot collect fees from the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re BelyeaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
  2. Wrublik v. Wrublik (In Re Wrublik)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  3. Stine v. Diamond (In Re Flynn)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Andrade v. Essenfeld (In re Andrade)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  5. In re GuyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API