Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1986No. DC DA 249576; DA 249577; CA A29759; SC S31637Published

1Opinion of the Court

721 P.2d 1357 (1986)

301 Or. 268

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on review,

v.

Roderick Darnell BROWN, Respondent on review.

DC DA 249576; DA 249577; CA A29759; SC S31637.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc[*].

Argued and Submitted September 10, 1985.

Reassigned March 4, 1986.

Decided July 1, 1986.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

David C. Degner, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent on review.

JONES, Justice.

This case presents the question whether…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API