I.H.M v. Contra Costa County
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I.H.M., Case No. 22-cv-06026-VC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART, v. DENYING IN PART, THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al., DISMISS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 108 The motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. This order assumes the reader’s familiarity with the facts, governing legal standards, and arguments made by the parties. 1. Rooker-Feldman. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine deprives a district court of jurisdiction “when the plaintiff in federal district court complains of a legal wrong allegedly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Eric Noel v. Brian C. Hall Sandra A. Hall, Fka Sandra Johnson, and Gabrielle S. Lennartz Herb Weisser Michelle A. MerchantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- AE Ex Rel. Hernandez v. County of TulareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Kevin Cooper v. Michael RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- HENRY A. v. WilldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.