Legal Opinion

Risk v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. Docket No. 123Published

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). The trial judge properly entered judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto. Defendant’s counsel were right in both contentions. In the recent case of Howe v. Railroad Co., 236 Mich. 577, an action brought under the Federal act, Mr. Justice Snow exhaustively reviewed the authorities, particularly the Federal ones, dealing with the questions of negligence and assumption of risk. This renders it unnecessary to duplicate that work. Attention will be challenged, however, to a few cases which are somewhat in point.

The handcar was the kind in ordinary use on railroads;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Howe v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Mize v. Louisville & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. Owens v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Kalivas v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API