Legal Opinion

Winchell v. Lopiccolo

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*459OPINION OF THE COURT

Paul I. Marx, J.

Upon the papers read on defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel plaintiff to provide outstanding discovery-demanded by defendants, it is ordered that the motion to compel is denied in part and granted in part.

This personal injury action arises out of a motor vehicle accident which occurred in Montgomery, New York on March 13, 2009. Plaintiff alleged in her bill of particulars that she suffered various injuries, including physical injury and “mild traumatic brain injury,” “blunt facial and head trauma,” “persistent ecchymosis in the forehead,”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Romano v. Steelcase Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Patterson v. Turner Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Kregg v. MaldonadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. McCann v. Harleysville InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A.D. v. C.A.New York Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Brogan v. Rosenn, Jenkins & Greenwald, LLP, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API