Legal Opinion

Hill v. Polar Pantries

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 30, 1951No. 16496PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OxnER, Justice.

This is an action for the recovery of damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellant in furnishing unsuitable and defective plans and specifications for the insulation of a frozen food locker plant and in failing to properly supervise the work. The trial resulted in a verdict for respondent in the sum of $10,100.00. The only question for determination on this appeal is whether the Court below erred in refusing a motion by appellant for a directed verdict. Appellant contends that there is no proof of a breach of the contract made with respondent and no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Worrell v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. Kennedy v. BowlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. General Fireproofing Co. v. L. Wallace & SonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  4. Minemount Realty Co., Inc. v. BallentineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  5. Rivers v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Eastern Steel Constructors, Inc. v. City of SalemWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hoven v. KelbleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Markman v. HoeferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API