Legal Opinion

Young Co., Inc. v. Heinz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1928No. Appeal 530PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Plaintiff, a corporation doing business as a real estate broker, sued to recover commissions alleged to be due it by defendants in connection with the sale of land of the latter. At the trial the court below entered a compulsory non-suit and from the order refusing to take it off plaintiff appeal's.

The evidence warrants the following statement of facts: Defendants owned, as tenants in common, several pieces of real estate in the City of Pittsburgh. They formed a partnership known as the Reliance Realty Company and filed a certificate under the Fictitious Name Act of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butler v. MaplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Thompson, Exrx. v. BarrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Bonwell v. HowesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1888
  4. Deliman v. Greek Catholic UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. D. Brown Co., Inc. v. Stand. H. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Industrial Molded Plastic Products, Inc. v. J. Gross & Son, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Arrott Steam Power Mills Co. v. Philadelphia Wood Heel Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API