Brown-Duffy Goatskin Corp. v. Henkel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Dowling, J.:. This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff to separately state and number the several causes of action now set forth in the complaint as the first cause of action brought to recover the sum of $1,869.44.
*343The motion was made upon the complaint and plaintiff’s bill of particulars, under rule 90 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
Clearly the first cause of action to recover the sum of $1,869.44 set forth in the complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars, is made up of five separate causes of action to recover the amount of the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Padilla v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Newton v. Livingston County Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- O'Hara v. DerschugAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- Whitree v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.