Legal Opinion

Royal Nissan, Inc. v. Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1994No. 93-CA-1955Published

1Opinion of the Court

liKLEES, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Royal Nissan, Inc. [“Royal”] and Diamond Motors, Inc. [“Diamond”], appeal the trial court’s judgment dismissing their case upon the granting of an exception of no cause of action in favor of the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission, [“LMVC”] and exceptions of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and peremption in favor of defendant Price Leblanc Nissan, Inc. [“Price”]. We reverse.

On June 8, 1992, Price applied to the LMVC for a license to operate a Nissan *1126automobile dealership in Ascension Parish. Pursuant to La.R.S. 32:1254(F)(1), Diamond and Royal were given notice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Findley v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Benson & Gold Chev. v. La. Motor Veh. Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  3. American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Louisiana Motor Vehicle CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Billy Navarre Chevrolet, Inc. v. Executive Director, Louisiana Motor Vehicle CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Harris Chevrolet, Inc. v. Louisiana Motor Vehicle CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API