Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Monte

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 25, 1946No. 4 Div. 382Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

2Per curiam

We are now asked to modify and affirm the decree of the trial court. Hugh Monte, through cotmsel, has disclaimed all-interest or right in the partnership and both parties, by respective counsel, agree that the amount due Miss Regis Monte is $3,- 777.72, as stated by the Clayton audit.

Accordingly, the judgment of reversal is-set aside and the decree of the lower court is so modified that appellee have and recover of appellant the stated sum.

This being an accounting between partners and no special equities appearing to avert application of the general rule, interest on said sum will…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lunsford v. ShannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API