Legal Opinion

Stuckey v. Stuckey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1982No. 12554Published

1Per curiam

Defendant filed a motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case in this personal injury action. The court sustained the motion and made a docket entry to that effect. The record reflects the entry of no judgment for defendant consistent with the *407bare docket entry ruling the motion. Such recital does not constitute a final judgment nor an otherwise appealable order. § 512.-020, RSMo 1978; Herndon v. Ford, 470 S.W.2d 168 (Mo.App.1971). The prematurity of this appeal goes to appellate jurisdiction which this court has a duty to ascertain sua sponte. City of Sikeston v. Missouri…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herndon v. FordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. City of Sikeston v. Missouri Utilities Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API