Legal Opinion
Mississippi Industries v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 6, 1987No. Nos. 85-1611, 85-1613, 85-1620, 85-1621, 85-1615 to 85-1619, 85-1623, 85-1624, 85-1626, 85-1637, 85-1640, 85-1647, 85-1712, 85-1719 and 85-1772PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
Separate opinion by Circuit Judge BORK, concurring in part and dissenting in part. PER CURIAM:
We consider eighteen consolidated petitions for review of two orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission).1 In the orders under review the Commission held that the four operating companies of the Middle South Utilities (MSU) system must share the costs of MSU’s investment in nuclear energy in proportion to their relative demand for energy generated by the system as a whole. The Commission implemented this scheme by reallocating responsibility for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mississippi Industries v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Missouri Public Service Commission, Mississippi Power & Light Company, Louisiana Power & Light Company, City of New Orleans, Louisiana, Mississippi Public Service Commission, State of Arkansas, Union Carbide Corporation, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Arkansas & Missouri Congressional Delegations, Louisiana Public Service Commission, Arkansas Public Service Commission, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, Arkansas Power & Light Company, Middle South Energy, Inc., Middle South Services, Inc., and Cities of Conway and West Memphis, Arkansas, Intervenors. Mississippi Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mississippi Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Reynolds Metals Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas and Missouri Congressional Delegations v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of Arkansas v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mississippi Legal Services Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of New Orleans v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Missouri Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Representative Webb Franklin v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Pittman v. MISSISSIPPI PSCMississippi Supreme Court · 1987