Woodley v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Judge.
We affirm Appellants’ conviction for kidnapping. Taking the facts most favorably to the state, the trial court did not err in denying Appellants’ motion to dismiss filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(e)(4). Appellants, charged with multiple counts of robbery and kidnapping, pled no contest to kidnapping charges, reserving the right to appeal the denial of the motion.
As traversed, the facts reflect that the robbery victim was using an ATM machine when she was robbed at gunpoint by Appellants. During the robbery, her son was ordered out of their car and to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Faison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- State v. BuggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Biggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999