Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Williams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1925No. 1 Div. 399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The instrument tendered for record is an assignment of a vendor’s lien. The deed which forms the basis for the lien was executed in March, 1925, and duly recorded, and, presumably, the mortgage tax due thereon has been paid.

A vendor’s lien is implied by law (Kyle v. Bellenger, 79 Ala. 516), and it is an equitable right to subject the land in equity to the payment of the purchase price (39 Cyc. pp. 1787, 1788). “After conveyance, the lien of the vendor is a mere equitable charge, without any estate in the lands, * * *=* a mere creation of equity.” Sykes v. Betts, 87 Ala. 537, 6 So. 428; Hester…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kyle v. BellengerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Hester v. HunnicuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. State Ex Rel. Blue v. StilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Sykes v. BettsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Garrison v. HamlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Long v. Jasper Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API