Berg Co. v. Thomas & Son Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 252, Jan. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 2818, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of The Berg Company v. I. P. Thomas & Son Company. Assumpsit on a contract for the sale of personal property. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 252, Jan. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 2818, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of The Berg Company v. I. P. Thomas & Son Company. Assumpsit on a contract for the sale of personal property. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The contract upon which the action was brought was, in part, as follows: Philadelphia, Pa., May 19, 1915. I. P. Thomas & Son Company, Philadelphia, Pa., have sold and The Berg Company, Philadelphia, Pa., have bought From…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
This appeal is dismissed on the concise and clear opinion of the learned court below discharging the rule for judgment.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Music, Inc. v. Henry B. Klein Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Baum's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Cohen v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- HRAPCZYNSKI, JR. v. BRISTLECONE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.