Legal Opinion

In Re Barry

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 28, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

90 N.J. 286 (1982)

447 A.2d 923

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS J. BARRY, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 26, 1982.

Decided July 28, 1982.

Robyn M. Hill argued the cause for complainant, Disciplinary Review Board (Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, attorney).

Saverio R. Principato argued the cause for respondent.

2Per curiam

These disciplinary proceedings commenced with the filing of a complaint with the District IV Ethics Committee (local committee) by the law firm with which respondent, Thomas Barry, was associated. The firm charged Barry with a series of what can be described only as…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BarrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. In Re SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API