Legal Opinion
Lichtenstein v. Barbanel
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 20, 2005No. 04-6300UnpublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
The question presented in this appeal is whether the bankruptcy court correctly concluded that a court-approved stipulated waiver of discharge of a specific debt, entered into by Appellant Stephen Lichtenstein (“Dr.Lichtenstein”) in his first Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, was a valid, enforceable waiver of discharge' under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(10), and thus excepted that debt, owed to his ex-wife Ap-pellee Roberta Barbanel (“Ms.Barbanel”), from discharge in his second Chapter 7 bankruptcy case under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(10). The Bankruptcy Court held that the stipulated waiver was valid, and the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Hayhoe v. Cole (In Re Cole)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Vern O. LAING, Debtor. Vern O. LAING, Appellant, v. Lawrence A.G. JOHNSON and Don Bradshaw, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Simmons Capital Advisors, Ltd. v. Bachinski (In Re Bachinski)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Wank v. Gordon (In Re Wank)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Infinity Group LLC v. Lucas (In re Lucas)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- In Re HerreraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
- In re JeneretteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.