Federal Deposit Insurance v. Alker
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LAYTON, District Judge.
This is an action for a deficiency judgment on a note and for other relief. Before the Court is defendants’ motion for a new trial under 28 U.S.C.A. Civil Procedure Rule 60(b). This case has had a long history. The trial Court found for plaintiff in 1944 in an unreported opinion. That judgment was subsequently affirmed on appeal. 151 F.2d 907 (3rd Cir., 1945). Since then, defendants have repeatedly filed various motions for review, certiorari, new trial, etc., which are summarized in the margin, none of which have produced reversal or modification of the original…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. KarahaliasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- John E. Smith's Sons Company v. Lattimer Foundry & MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davidson v. DixonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Leon A. Boughner v. Secretary Of Health, Education And WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Tann v. Service Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Boughner v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Marquette Corporation v. PriesterDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.