Legal Opinion

Saxer v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided August 29, 2003No. 09-01-499-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice.

A jury convicted Norman Saxer of murder and assessed his punishment at fifty years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. Saxer raises seven issues for our consideration. His first two issues complain of the lack of legally and factually sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction. Issues three through five complain of trial court error in permitting extraneous offense/bad act evidence to be admitted before the jury. Issues six and seven refer to the trial court’s refusal to permit Saxer to impeach a State’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. Valle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  3. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  4. Anibal Heriberto Valle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  5. Anibal Heriberto Valle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API