Legal Opinion

Metal Specialty Products Corp. v. Howal-Ronset Instrument Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover the sum of $13,229.39 as the balance alleged to be due for goods sold and delivered, of which sum $6,738.20 is represented by four promissory notes, each being the basis of a separate cause of action in the complaint, in which the complaint also alleges *746a fifth cause of action on the contract for said balance due, and in which the defendant has asserted a counterclaim for $7,497.60 based on plaintiff’s alleged breach of the contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 15, 1963, which: (1) granted plaintiff’s motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dodwell & Co. v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Luotto v. FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Smith v. Cranleigh, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Weinstein v. Primrose Blouse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ray v. Hertz Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API