Legal Opinion

Blake v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 1, 1981No. Docket Nos. 8549-79, 8550-79UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. PRESTLEY BLAKE and SETSU BLAKE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; S. PRESTLEY BLAKE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Blake v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 8549-79, 8550-79.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1981-579; 1981 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 165; 42 T.C.M. (CCH) 1336; T.C.M. (RIA) 81579;

October 1, 1981.

Robert K. Gad, III, and Harry K. Mansfield, for the petitioners.

Pamela V. Gibson and Daniel P. Ehrenreich, for the respondent.

RAUM

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

RAUM, Judge: The Commissioner determined the following deficiencies and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Golanty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  3. Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. Cumberland Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Engdahl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leonard Greene and Joyce Greene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. S. Prestley Blake and Setsu Blake v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Greene v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API