Legal Opinion

In re M.C.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1996No. 95-0871PublishedCited by 396 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a jury trial, the trial court rendered judgment in this case terminating L.C.’s parental rights to her three children, M.C., D.C., and C.W. The court of appeals held that the evidence was “not sufficient” to support the judgment because “[tjhere was no evidence that L.C. ‘endangered’ her children.” — S.W.2d -, -[, 1996 WL 102361]. Finding that the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (TDPRS) presented legally sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s judgment, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this case to that court so that it may…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Havner v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re MC, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1996

3Cited by396 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.T.G., H.N.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  2. in the Interest of J.D., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  3. In Interest of DLN, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  4. In the Interest of M.J.M.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. In the Interest of E.R.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

391 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API