Legal Opinion
KOLOSHA v. STATE
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 6, 2017No. 115,302PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REIF, J.:
¶ 1 This appeal arises from an unsuccessful effort by pro se inmate Vitaly Burleovitsh Kolosha in 2015 to recover a computer, a photo camera and a movie camera seized by law enforcement in 2006. Mr. Kolosha filed a pleading that he captioned “Petition for Writ of Replevin or $2500 Reimbursement” in his Tulsa County criminal case. The pleading averred that this property had nothing to do with the criminal charges and it had not been returned to him. The pleading also contained a certificate signed by Mr. Kolosha declaring the pleading was true and had been mailed to a state senator,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Powell v. DicksionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Wilhoit v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Greer v. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- STATE ex rel. OKLA. STATE BD. OF MEDICAL LICENSURE AND SUPERVISION v. RIVEROSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- STATE ex rel. OKLA. STATE BD. OF MEDICAL LICENSURE AND SUPERVISION v. RIVEROSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- KOLOSHA v. STATESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017