Palmer v. Mann
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Chief Justice.
1. “An action of complaint for land can not be dismissed on demurrer to the abstract of title annexed to the declaration. The object of the abstract is not to show title in the plaintiff on the face of the pleadings, but only to give notice of what will be relied upon at the trial.” Crawford v. Carter, 146 Ga. 526 (91 S. E. 780); Chancey v. Johnson, 148 Ga. 87 (95 S. E. 975); Peeples v. Rudulph, 153 Ga. 17 (111 S. E. 548); Yonn v. Pittman, 82 Ga. 637 (1) (9 S. E. 667).
2. In an action of ejectment the premises are described with sufficient certainty, if the description…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Peeples v. RudulphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Tarver v. DeppenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Jackson v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Hightower v. Blakely Hardwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Chancey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carroll v. CraigSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Minor v. SullivanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965