Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the defendant’s contention in his supplemental pro se brief, the testimony presented at the pretrial hearing established that his identification by witness Anthony Watts was merely confirmatory, and that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress Watts’s identification testimony was thus properly denied (see People v Garner, 27 AD3d 764 [2006]; People v Jenkins, 230 AD2d 806, 807 [1996]; cf. People v Rodriguez, 79 NY2d 445 [1992]).

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally *674insufficient to establish his intent to inflict serious physical injury…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. AcevedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. AdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API