Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Dunlap

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1906No. 14,467PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Norton district court; Abel C. T. Geiger, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,:

The court has examined each assignment of error made in this proceeding, and after a consideration of the entire case is unable to declare that prejudicial error was committed. Many qf the specifications are ashes from which the heat of the fire of the trial has subsided. Such are those relating to leading questions, evidence merely immaterial, and instructions refused in form but given in substance. Most of the testimony assailed is not, when fairly considered, open to criticism. Standing alone, a few answers appear to be improper; but the entire body of the evidence is such that…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleischhauer v. FabensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API