Legal Opinion
Wickesser v. Burns
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1965No. Civ. 21953PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff Eleanor Wiekesser from a judgment rendered in her action for personal injuries in favor of the defendants Carl Burns and Freedom Union School District.
The facts are substantially without conflict. Defendant Burns was operating a pickup truck of his employer, the defendant school district, and was making a left-hand turn into Roache Road from Highway 1 in Watsonville, California, when a collision took place with a car driven by plaintiff, approaching the intersection on Highway 1 from the opposite direction. Burns did not see plaintiff’s car until it collided…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Smith v. Sugich Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Miller v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Scott v. MacKeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Sheppard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Menchaca v. Helms Bakeries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. OyaasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Getas v. HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Mezerkor v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Shuff v. Irwindale Trucking Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.