Legal Opinion

Heser v. Heser

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1989No. 87-156PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent-appellee, Michael Paul Heser, cross-appeals the division of property. The petitioner-appellant, Patricia Ann Heser, has dismissed her appeal.

As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in dividing the property of the parties. See, Fox v. Fox, 230 Neb. 218, 430 N.W.2d 542 (1988); Griffith v. Griffith, 230 Neb. 314, 431 N.W.2d 609 (1988).

Upon a de novo review of this case, we find no patent unfairness in the distribution of property and debts of the parties. See, Rezac v. Rezac, 221 Neb.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffith v. GriffithNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Black v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rezac v. RezacNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Fox v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gibson-Voss v. VossNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Marshall v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API