Legal Opinion
Carl R. Pitasi v. Gartner Group, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 23, 1999No. 98-1496PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Carl R. Pitasi was employed by Gartner Group, Inc. (“Gartner”) from August 1988 until January 3, 1996. His employment was terminated when he was 52 years old. Mr. Pitasi brought suit in federal court against Gartner under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-633a (“ADEA”), alleging that he had been dismissed because of his age. He now appeals the district court’s grant of Gartner’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth in the following opinion, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Gartner is a company that…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- John Anderson v. Patrick DonahoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Kenneth Harper v. C.R. England, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- James Hunt v. City of Markham, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Leroy Gordon v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Brinda Adams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.