Legal Opinion

State v. Willis, 08ap-536 (1-27-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2009No. 08AP-536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Gregory S. Willis is appealing his conviction on two charges of rape and one charge of kidnapping. He assigns a single error for our consideration:

THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY NOT ALLOWING THE DEFENDANT TO REPRESENT HIMSELF DURING THE DEFENSE PHASE OF THE TRIAL AND FURTHER DENIED THE DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO RECALL A STATE WITNESS; THEREBY VIOLATING HIS UNITED STATES AND OHIO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

{¶ 2} On January 1, 2007, J.E. was raped. The issue at Willis' trial was whether or not he was the rapist.

{¶ 3} J.E. testified at length during the trial and clearly identified Willis as the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Joseph Frederick Robards v. John Rees, Superintendent, Kentucky State Reformatory and David L. Armstrong, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API