State v. Willis, 08ap-536 (1-27-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Gregory S. Willis is appealing his conviction on two charges of rape and one charge of kidnapping. He assigns a single error for our consideration:
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY NOT ALLOWING THE DEFENDANT TO REPRESENT HIMSELF DURING THE DEFENSE PHASE OF THE TRIAL AND FURTHER DENIED THE DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO RECALL A STATE WITNESS; THEREBY VIOLATING HIS UNITED STATES AND OHIO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
{¶ 2} On January 1, 2007, J.E. was raped. The issue at Willis' trial was whether or not he was the rapist.
{¶ 3} J.E. testified at length during the trial and clearly identified Willis as the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Joseph Frederick Robards v. John Rees, Superintendent, Kentucky State Reformatory and David L. Armstrong, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 2010