William R. Fix v. Frank Forelle
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, Justice.
[11] This appeal arises out of a controversy between neighbors William Fix, Appellant, and Frank Forelle, Appellee, concerning the construction of a fence along the border of their adjoining properties. After prevailing on his claim in the district court, Mr. Fix, an attorney who represented himself in the matter, claimed that he was entitled to attorney fees according to the terms of the covenants at issue. The district court disagreed and Mr. Fix appealed. We find that because Mr. Fix did not incur any fees, he is not entitled to an award of fees. We therefore affirm.
ISSUE
[12]…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Joseph Falcone v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Michael Alan Crooker v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Prudential Preferred Properties v. J and J Ventures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Windham v. WindhamWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Reichert v. DaughertyWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Ultra Resources, Inc., a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Ecocards, a Wyoming Corporation v. Tekstir, Inc., a Delaware CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Tep Rocky Mountain Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, F/K/A Wpx Energy Rocky Mountain, Llc, a Delaware Limited Liability Company v. Record Tj Ranch Limited Partnership, a Wyoming Limited PartnershipWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.