Legal Opinion

Creed v. Stokes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 10, 1985No. 22341PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant C. W. Stokes appeals in this boundary dispute. The master and trial judge ruled respondents had established title to the disputed property by adverse possession. We affirm.

Stokes’ only contention is the lower court erred in ordering this matter referred to the master. He correctly contends he had a right to a jury trial since this was a land title dispute. See S. C. Const. Art. I, § 14.

However, appellant waived his objection to the order of reference. Though he opposed the order, he failed to appeal from it. The order was not interlocutory, and should have been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pelfrey Ex Rel. Associated Railway Contractors, Inc. v. Bank of GreerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. First Union Nat. Bank of SC v. SodenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Link v. School District of Pickens CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Breland v. Love Chevrolet Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Lester v. DawsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API