Legal Opinion
Nazari v. Ayrapetyan
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 2009No. B198778PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
In his personal injury action against defendant Set Ayrapetyan, plaintiff Varoj Nazari obtained a special verdict in his favor. He appeals from the ensuing $53,061.40 judgment and the order denying his new trial motion. At issue in the published portion of this opinion is Evidence Code section 755.5, which renders inadmissible the record of, or testimony concerning, a defendant’s medical examination conducted of a plaintiff who is not proficient in English without the aid of a certified interpreter. We hold that section 755.5 does not prohibit testimony of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- DE JESUS VERDIN v. Superior Court of Riverside CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Sherman v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Graham v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Hernandez v. First Student, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- 139 S. Occidental Blvd. v. Ha CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Argueta v. Worldwide Flight Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.