Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Bondurant

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1937No. 4202Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

HUDSPETH, Chief Justice.

The opinion in this case has drawn two motions. Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing and reargues assignments of error heretofore considered. We have again carefully reviewed the record and find the motion without merit, and accordingly it is denied. Appellee has filed a remittitur of $50 and asks that the costs he taxed against the appellant.

The statute formerly left the court no discretion in the assessment of costs. Childers v. Hubbell, 15 N.M. 450, 454, 110 P. 1051; King v. Tabor, 15 N.M. 488, 110 P. 601. The statute was amended in 1917 so as to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cobb v. McCallSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Tyler v. WaltSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Williams v. GrayMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. King v. TaborNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Weatherspoon v. StacklandOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API